Quantcast
Channel: Missile
Viewing all 330 articles
Browse latest View live

US Defense Companies Are Scrambling To Meet China's Low Low Arms Prices (RTN)

$
0
0

HQ-9 China MissileChina has pushed its defense spending to record highs as it builds a global force from the ground up.

The communist country has leapfrogged past advancements that took Western nations decades to perfect — and it's now looking to turn a profit on all that work.

Hurriyet today announced the race to equip Turkey with a long-range missile system is well underway and China's already sent other countries scrambling.

Europe, Russia, the U.S. and China are all competing for the $4 billion contract and Beijing's Precision Machinery HQ-9 is the lowest competing bid so far.

Word is the offer came in at $1 billion less than expected after Beijing tried to cut the original estimate by half.

American company Raytheon was forced to revise its offer to stay in the running, but officials there won't comment on just how much until the contract is selected next month.

In the end it may not matter if China loses money on the deal if the fears of some experts are proven justified, and it achieves access to new classified data.

Some believe that Russian and Chinese systems are incompatible with NATO systems and that with a successful bid, either of those countries would achieve access to classified NATO information.

Turkey has refused to exclude either China or Russia despite the fact it could, in fact, compromise NATO's entire "set of procedures."

SEE ALSO: We tried to fly a drone but failed miserably >

SEE ALSO: This Before And After Image Of Afghanistan Is Hard To Believe >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


US And South Korean Military Send A Clear Message To Pyongyang

$
0
0

hyunmoo korean missile

North Korea's recent nuclear test incurred the standard international handwringing that follows most of what Pyongyang pulls off in that corner of the world. But once international leaders stepped from the cameras the real exchange began.

The guided-missile cruiser USS Lake Erie successfully completed a first-of-a-kind missile test about the time Pyongyang was underway with their test.

The Erie cruised out to the waters off the island of Kauai and waited for the missile range there to launch a medium range ballistic rocket to be brought down by Erie's Aegis system.

There have been dozens of successful Aegis tests over the past 10 years, but this was special because the Erie used new off-the-shelf electronics to work with an orbiting tracking system. The space-based system allows the Aegis to take down incoming missiles far sooner and at much greater distances than before.

Sooner means safer and with incoming ordnance out of the way, offensive strikes can be delivered that much earlier.

For its part South Korea reminded the North it had a missile that could strike deep into the North and offered video showing the Hyunmoo-3C launched from a submarine and a shipboard system.

The weapon's current configuration has been in service for almost a year, but now seemed a good time for a South Korean ministry official to announce how accurate the missile actually is.

"The cruise missile unveiled today is a precision-guided weapon that can identify and strike the office window of the North's command headquarters."

Not to be outdone, South Korean army Major General Ryu Young-Jeo had this to say: "With this missile, we could hit any facility, equipment or individual target in the North anywhere, at any time of our choosing."

South Korea's military jumped to high alert following the North's test and remains there now as it puts all plans for missile defense and greater projection into high gear.

The Aegis intercept video from the Erie is below. The action decidedly picks up at about 1 minute in.

SEE ALSO: 16 fascinating details about the guy who shot Bin Laden raid >

SEE ALSO: The Military and Defense Facebook page for updates >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

This Is The US Missile No Ship Will See Coming Until It's Too Late

$
0
0

Lockheed Long Range Anti-Ship Missile

The U.S. Navy has this problem where sinking a ship far away requires all manner of mathematical genius, and extraordinary luck, that really does no more than illuminate its limited strike reach in the first place.

U.S. enemies create large "no go" zones for the Navy, while producing better weapons with longer reach. It's not pretty, as the fleet ages, and budget cuts reign supreme.

DARPA looks to end that with its $71 million award to Lockheed Martin for the modification to Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) so that it can perform an air and surface launch, while able to withstand electromagnetic forces trying to drag it off course.

The LRASM is the evolution of the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile begun in 1998 and costing about $700,000 apiece. That is to say this missile has a history and is designed to be launched from the Mark 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS), and the F-35 Lightning II.

For its most recent test, the LRASM will slip from the B-1 Bone and drive mercilessly toward its target that one can imagine will never see it coming before vaporizing into ancient history.

This is a missile that's been a long time coming and the result of years work and expense, a little enthusiasm seems in order.

Lockheed says:

Armed with a proven penetrator and blast-fragmentation warhead, LRASM cruises autonomously, day or night, in all weather conditions. The missile employs a multi-modal sensor, weapon data link, and an enhanced digital anti-jam Global Positioning System to detect and destroy specific targets within a group of ships.

Something needs to bolster the fleet, and this looks like it could do the trick.

The pics are an illustration from Lockheed (above) on the new missile and an older shot of the Bone with the JASSM-ER that came before.

The B1 Bone

SEE ALSO: Why Green Berets are the baddest, smartest warriors in the world >

SEE ALSO: The Military & Defense Facebook page for updates >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

North Korean Kids Dance With Smiling Rocket To Celebrate Lunar New Year

Here's What We Know About What North Korea Can Hit

$
0
0

NKoreaGraphic

Despite North Korea's highly-publicized missile tests, relatively little is known about the actual size and capabilities of its arsenal.

The regime is understood to have substantial numbers of short- and intermediate-range missiles such as the Nodong, a variant on the Scud missile.

With a range of around 1,000km, the Nodong could in theory strike in South Korea and Japan. However, its poor accuracy makes it an ineffective battlefield weapon and it is unlikely North Korea would be able to pinpoint U.S. military bases in the region, although it could cause serious civilian casualties.

The middle-range Musudan missile is of major concern to Japan as its 4,000km capability would allow the North Korean regime to strike anywhere in Japanese territory. Estimates of the size of North Korea's Musudan arsenal vary widely, with figures ranging from only a dozen to more than 200.

The Taepodong 1 was North Korea's first multi-stage missile, a significant technological development where the weapon depends on different thrusters at different times. However it has proved a poor performer, with limited range and unreliable accuracy.

However, its older brother, the Taepodong 2, is treated far more seriously by U.S. defense authorities. The 40m missile is believed to have a range of 6,000km, meaning it could in theory hit Alaska. In December 2012, a variant of the Taepodong 2 successfully launched a satellite into space.

Barry Pavel, a former senior director for defense policy at the White House's National Security Council, described the launch as "a milestone."

"It's the same general technology as is required for intercontinental nuclear missile, so it's a concern," he said

SEE ALSO: Kim Jong-Un has already hit his intended target >

SEE ALSO: Here's 20,000 well-armed reasons why North Korea should chill out >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

ANALYST: US Military Expects North Korean Missile Launch

$
0
0

Kim Jong-Un

Enough bluster: Apparently Kim Jong-Un intends to walk the walk.

A prominent arms analyst has told an Australian think-tank that U.S. troop movements west of the peninsula indicate that a North Korean missile launch is imminent.

From the Lowy Institute for International Policy:

"The United States, Australia and other allies appear to be taking important policy decisions on the basis of the imminent deployment of the KN-08. If this is the case, they should say so directly and provide the basis for asserting the imminent deployment of the KN-08," said Jeffrey Lewis, founding editor of Arms Control Wonk.

The impending launch comes on the heels of intelligence about missile movements on the western side of the peninsula. Pentagon Press Secretary told reporters yesterday that "test flights" of certain missile systems were possible.

The surest sign of intent occurred Wednesday morning when North Korea delayed the passage of and then blocked hundreds of South Korean workers from the shared Kaesong market. If the market remains closed on Thursday, it would be another strong indicator of intent.

This measure from Kim Jong-Un follows significant troop movements on behalf of both the U.S. and China. Bill Gertz of the Washington Free Beacon recently reported that troops have begun staging in two of China's northeast provinces.

Those provinces both align with known nuclear sites inside North Korea.

Meanwhile, the U.S. has moved an advanced radar and two Aegis class destroyers off the west coast. The $900 million SBX radar array has been compared to the Iron Dome in Israel, only much more accurate — and the Aegis-class destroyers are particularly adept at knocking missiles out of the sky.

The kicker, though, is that until recently, analysts thought these particular North Korean missiles were just a prop. Little is known about KN-08 road-mobile missile, other than from what was seen at a parade in April 2012.

North Korea MissileAnalysts say it could be medium-range, or worse, an intercontinental variety. Still, they have no idea what to expect.

There's also talk about the somewhat less terrifying Musudan, which is believed to be a varient of the SCUD — a missile more fit for terrifying soft-targets, like population centers, rather than taking out military targets.

Though Gertz and other analysts tend to believe China's troop movements are in support of North Korea, recent calls from Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to top military leadership in China indicate some level of cooperation.

Recently, the Army released information about a wargame concerning the fall of Kim Jong-Un, the collapse of the government, and follow on actions to protect the estimated eight nuclear warheads in North Korean possession.

SEE ALSO: Kim Jong-Un has already hit his intended target >

SEE ALSO: North Korea's nuclear talk is causing a stir in China >

SEE ALSO: The DPRK's Air Force is filled with decrepit MiGs >

SEE ALSO: Our Military and Defense Facebook page for updates >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

US Official Says North Korea Could Launch Missile Soon

$
0
0

South Korea MarinesOfficials close to the Obama administration are saying that a North Korean missile launch is likely to happen soon.

Barbara Starr of CNNreports that "the most recent intelligence showing it is likely Pyongyang has completed launch preparations," likely referring to the flurry of missile movements reported on in the last two weeks.

From CNN:

The administration believes a test launch could happen without North Korea issuing a standard notice to commercial aviation and maritime shipping warning them to stay away from the missile's path, according to the official, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the information.

He said the launch could be "imminent" but also cautioned the United States "simply doesn't know."

The New York Times' David Sanger recently wrote about leaked White House plans in the case of a DPRK ballistic missile launch. The likely reactions from the U.S. and ROK range from watching the missile fly into the ocean, or shooting it down, depending on its trajectory and intended target.

Officials say the missile could be the Musudan or KN-08, two missiles about which America has little intelligence. Until recently it was thought the Musudan could be an inert prop.

Though previous warnings have come from studied analysts, this most recent comes from the U.S. administration. It's possible the world will find out of Kim Jong-Un's missiles are really just props.

SEE ALSO: Our Military and Defense Facebook page for updates >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Iran Claims To Have Tested Cutting Edge Rocket, Offers No Evidence

$
0
0

Iran Missile

Days before a big military ceremony, Iran has made more unverified claims of new missile technology.

Iran says it has successfully tested a cutting edge surface-to-surface medium range rocket with advanced guidance systems.

Reutersreports the claim came with this statement from General Majid Bokaei, Iran's deputy defense minister: "When this missile was tested, all the enemies' destroyers and ships retreated from near our borders."

He then said it's capable of entering space, then re-entering the atmosphere at "high speed" and "completely destroys the target vessel or warship."

Reuters notes that Iran, known for doctoringimages of military tests, made a similar unverified claim in August, when it announced the successful test of a short-range ballistic missile.

Pieter Wezeman, a senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), voiced skepticism to Reuters reporters, saying that it's difficult to verify, and that Iran's missiles have always suffered accuracy problems.

"We always have to be aware of the propaganda value of all these claims," Wezeman told Reuters.

So far, no Western officials have come forward to confirm a military detection of such a missile launch.

SEE ALSO: Our Facebook page for updates --->

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Pentagon: North Korea Is Moving Closer To Having A Long-Range Nuclear Missile

$
0
0

kim jong un

North Korea "will move closer" to developing a long-range nuclear missile that can strike the US, according to the Pentagon's latest assessment.

In a report to Congress released Thursday, the US Defense Department said that North Korea's recent advances in missile technology, as showcased at the height of its standoff with South Korea, were "in line with North Korea's stated objective of being able to strike the US homeland."

"North Korea will move closer to this goal, as well as increase the threat it poses to US forces and allies in the region, if it continues testing and devoting scarce regime resources to these programs," the report said.

More from GlobalPost: Should we trust the Pentagon on North Korea?

The Pentagon has no reason to expect that North Korea will halt its costly and controversial nuclear tests or rocket launches, the report said, since Kim Jong Un's regime appears to believe that building up a nuclear arsenal will protect it from outside attack and help undermine South Korea's alliance with the US.

The Pentagon did not predict when North Korea might be capable of striking the US.

Certain crucial steps remain to be completed, it noted, including the testing of a re-entry vehicle necessary for a warhead to get back inside the Earth's atmosphere and hit a target.

The report was a repeat of earlier concerns that the Defense Department has been peddling ever since the United Nations expanded its third round of sanctions against Pyongyang in early February.

More from GlobalPost: North Korea likely capable of firing nuclear-armed missiles, says Pentagon intelligence agency

At a defense budget hearing in March, a Republican Congressman revealed a portion of a classified Pentagon document suggesting that North Korea had mastered the technology to place a small nuclear warhead of the tip of a missile.

The finding led to some controversy in the government, and revealed a number of schisms in the intelligence community.

At the hawkish end of the spectrum was the Pentagon's intelligence arm, the Defense Intelligence Agency, while the State Department appeared to be on the other side with some doubts. The White House was somewhere in the middle, with Obama stating in an NBC interview that he did not believe North Korea had achieved that level yet.

The current finding will probably fall under the same spectrum. There is fierce disagreement within the diplomatic and intelligence community over how soon North Korea – if ever – North Korea will reach the ability to strike the continental US.

So far, the White House has not commented on the latest report.

Geoffrey Cain contributed to this story from Seoul, South Korea.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Why North Korea Never Actually Launched That Rocket

$
0
0

north korea flag

Just a few weeks ago, analysts and experts were trumpeting the inevitability of North Korea's next rocket launch.

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) "neared the danger line," U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel warned. Pentagon officials told Fox News a North Korean "missile test could happen anytime," and a prominent arms analyst proclaimed a launch to be "imminent."

After all that fuss, the DPRK dismantled the missiles and quietly put them back into warehouses. Whew, that was close ... or was it? One expert told us the DPRK mostly uses missiles for intimidation and that the rockets are actually pretty failure-prone.

"As North Korea has learned with its intercontinental range missiles like the Unha 3, launch failures undercut their missile credibility. North Korea heavily tries to use its missiles for strategic intimidation," Dr. Bruce Bennett, a DPRK weapons expert at the Rand Corporation, said via email.

The unspoken question lurking in the shadow of North Korea's imminent April launch seemed to be, "Would it even get off the ground?" Regardless of the answer, the DPRK may have achieved its main objective of "strategic intimidation."

The U.S. reacted militarily and politically, Bennett noted. It issued several statements to the DPRK leadership. It flew B-2 bomber sorties and even moved special THAAD missile systems to Guam.

And the intimidation was likely internal as well. The Americans ended its bilateral training with South Korea just days prior to the North taking down those missiles. That move could have set up North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un to propagandize about repelling an American invasion.

Of course, actually firing the missiles once those objectives were achieved has a lot of risk attached.

"The North may be reluctant to test a missile that has a reasonable possibility of failure," Bennett says.

A rocket blowing up on the launch pad certainly would have taken the wind out of North Korea's threats. Launching the rocket also could have upset its best ally — China.

"North Korea may also be reluctant to test a missile if the test could cause a serious negative reaction from China — Chinese leaders appear to already be seriously unhappy with North Korean bad behavior," Bennett says.

SEE ALSO: Here's everything you need to know about the aircraft carrier that's scaring the pants of the DPRK right now >

SEE ALSO: The Army is preparing for a collapsed North Korea >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Piracy, Prisoners, And Missiles: North Korea Had A Busy Weekend

$
0
0

north korea missiles

Like an attention-seeking toddler, albeit one with nuclear weapons, North Korea rarely allows much time to go by without some destructive antics. As of this weekend, the unpredictable country appears to be ransoming a Chinese fishing boat, potentially talking with the US about an American prisoner it’s holding as a bargaining chip, and lofting a series of short-range missiles into the ocean near its concerned southern neighbor.

Things are never simple when it comes to North Korea. So what’s going on?

The boat

On Sunday, Beijing called on Pyongyang to release a fishing boat and its 16 crew members who were seized on May 5 by armed North Koreans. The boat’s owner, Yu Xuejun, said he was contacted by the boat’s captors who demanded that 600,000 yuan ($100,000) be delivered to a company registered in China near the North Korean border.

The Chinese embassy “promptly made representations” to the North Koreans for “release of the boat and fishermen as soon as possible,” according to a consular official quoted by the Chinese state news agency. It is not clear whether any ransom has been paid, or whether the boat’s captors are civilians or part of the North Korean military.

This is not the first time North Korea has bitten the hand that feeds it. Three Chinese boats were hijacked in May last year by unidentified captors who demanded $190,000 as ransom. They were eventually returned, but it’s not clear whether money actually changed hands.

The prisoner

As if upsetting one superpower wasn’t enough, North Korean media announced last week that Kenneth Bae, an American evangelica who operated tours in North Korea, had begun a 15-year sentence in a “special prison” for attempting to overthrow the state.

It’s not clear whether North Korea actually arrested Bae because he was carrying a National Geographic video called  “Don’t Tell My Mother I’m in North Korea,” or whether it hoped to use him as a bargaining chip in its dispute with the US. But eyebrows were raised on Monday when Robert King, the US special envoy to North Korea for human rights, abruptly cancelled his trip to South Korea. He may instead be negotiating with the North Koreans to secure Bae’s release, as he did for another detained American in 2011.

The missiles

In perhaps the least baroque North Korean provocation of the week, it resumed tests of its short range missiles into the ocean near South Korea. While it’s obviously never fun to see airborne munitions flying out of a country known to have nuclear weapons, this has happened many times before, most recently in December (paywall). If Kim Jong-un really wants the world’s attention, he may have to try a little harder.

More from Quartz:

Click here to sign up for the Quartz Daily Brief and start your day with the latest intelligence on the new global economy.

SEE ALSO: Iran wasted no time capitalizing on North Korean nuclear brinksmanship >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Norway Has A Powerful New Ship-Killing Missile [VIDEO]

$
0
0

Norwegian defense contractor, Kongsberg, has a new ship-killing missile that can deliver a 275-pound high explosive warhead from more than 100 miles away.

The Naval Strike Missile blurs the line between anti-ship missile and long-range precision cruise missile. A variant of the Naval Strike Missile, called the Joint Strike Missile, can be outfitted on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which the Norwegians are buying.

Watch the Norwegian military blow up a decommissioned navy frigate: 

SEE ALSO: US Accidentally Uploads Secret Israeli Missile Base Plans To Public Website

Join the conversation about this story »

Portable Missiles Capable Of Taking Out An Airliner Have Leaked Into Mali

$
0
0

SA-7 Missile Mali

TIMBUKTU, Mali (AP) — The photocopies of the manual lay in heaps on the floor, in stacks that scaled one wall, like Xeroxed, stapled handouts for a class.

Except that the students in this case were al-Qaida fighters in Mali. And the manual was a detailed guide, with diagrams and photographs, on how to use a weapon that particularly concerns the United States: A surface-to-air missile capable of taking down a commercial airplane.

The 26-page document in Arabic, recovered by The Associated Press in a building that had been occupied by al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb in Timbuktu, strongly suggests the group now possesses the SA-7 surface-to-air missile, known to the Pentagon as the Grail, according to terrorism specialists. And it confirms that the al-Qaida cell is actively training its fighters to use these weapons, also called man-portable air-defense systems, or MANPADS, which likely came from the arms depots of ex-Libyan strongman Col. Moammar Gadhafi.

_________________

EDITOR'S NOTE — This is the fourth story in an occasional series based on thousands of pages of internal al-Qaida documents recovered by The Associated Press earlier this year in Timbuktu, Mali.

_________________

"The existence of what apparently constitutes a 'Dummies Guide to MANPADS' is strong circumstantial evidence of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb having the missiles," said Atlantic Council analyst Peter Pham, a former adviser to the United States' military command in Africa and an instructor to U.S. Special Forces. "Why else bother to write the guide if you don't have the weapons? ... If AQIM not only has the MANPADS, but also fighters who know how to use them effectively," he added, "then the impact is significant, not only on the current conflict, but on security throughout North and West Africa, and possibly beyond."

The United States was so worried about this particular weapon ending up in the hands of terrorists that the State Department set up a task force to track and destroy it as far back as 2006. In the spring of 2011, before the fighting in Tripoli had even stopped, a U.S. team flew to Libya to secure Gadhafi's stockpile of thousands of heat-seeking, shoulder-fired missiles.

By the time they got there, many had already been looted.

"The MANPADS were specifically being sought out," said Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director for Human Rights Watch, who catalogued missing weapons at dozens of munitions depots and often found nothing in the boxes labelled with the code for surface-to-air missiles.

The manual is believed to be an excerpt from a terrorist encyclopedia edited by Osama bin Laden. It adds to evidence for the weapon found by French forces during their land assault in Mali earlier this year, including the discovery of the SA-7's battery pack and launch tube, according to military statements and an aviation official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to comment.

The knowledge that the terrorists have the weapon has already changed the way the French are carrying out their five-month-old offensive in Mali. They are using more fighter jets rather than helicopters to fly above its range of 1.4 miles (2.3 kilometers) from the ground, even though that makes it harder to attack the jihadists. They are also making cargo planes land and take off more steeply to limit how long they are exposed, in line with similar practices in Iraq after an SA-14 hit the wing of a DHL cargo plane in 2003.

And they have added their own surveillance at Mali's international airport in Bamako, according to two French aviation officials and an officer in the Operation Serval force. All three spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment.

"There are patrols every day," said the French officer. "It's one of the things we have not entrusted to the Malians, because the stakes are too high."

First introduced in the 1960s in the Soviet Union, the SA-7 was designed to be portable. Not much larger than a poster tube, it can be packed into a duffel bag and easily carried. It's also affordable, with some SA-7s selling for as little as $5,000.

Since 1975, at least 40 civilian aircraft have been hit by different types of MANPADS, causing about 28 crashes and more than 800 deaths around the world, according to the U.S. Department of State.

The SA-7 is an old generation model, which means most military planes now come equipped with a built-in protection mechanism against it. But that's not the case for commercial planes, and the threat is greatest to civilian aviation.

In Kenya in 2002, suspected Islamic extremists fired two SA-7s at a Boeing 757 carrying 271 vacationers back to Israel, but missed. Insurgents in Iraq used the weapons, and YouTube videos abound purporting to show Syrian rebels using the SA-7 to shoot down regime planes.

An SA-7 tracks a plane by directing itself toward the source of the heat, the engine. It takes time and practice, however, to fire it within range. The failure of the jihadists in Mali so far to hit a plane could mean that they cannot position themselves near airports with commercial flights, or that they are not yet fully trained to use the missile.

"This is not a 'Fire and forget' weapon," said Bruce Hoffman, director of the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University. "There's a paradox here. One the one hand it's not easy to use, but against any commercial aircraft there would be no defenses against them. It's impossible to protect against it. ... If terrorists start training and learn how to use them, we'll be in a lot of trouble."

In Timbuktu, SA-7 training was likely part of the curriculum at the 'Jihad Academy' housed in a former police station, said Jean-Paul Rouiller, director of the Geneva Center for Training and Analysis of Terrorism, one of three experts who reviewed the manual for AP. It's located less than 3 miles (5 kilometers) from the Ministry of Finance's Budget Division building where the manual was found.

Neighbors say they saw foreign fighters running laps each day, carrying out target practice and inhaling and holding their breath with a pipe-like object on their shoulder. The drill is standard practice for shoulder-held missiles, including the SA-7.

As the jihadists fled ahead of the arrival of French troops who liberated Timbuktu on Jan. 28, they left the manual behind, along with other instructional material, including a spiral-bound pamphlet showing how to use the KPV-14.5 anti-aircraft machine gun and another on how to make a bomb out of ammonium nitrate, among other documents retrieved by the AP. Residents said the jihadists grabbed reams of paper from inside the building, doused them in fuel and set them alight. The black, feathery ash lay on top of the sand in a ditch just outside the building's gate.

However, numerous buildings were still full of scattered papers.

"They just couldn't destroy everything," said neighbor Mohamed Alassane. "They appeared to be in a panic when the French came. They left in a state of disorder."

The manual is illustrated with grainy images of Soviet-looking soldiers firing the weapon. Point-by-point instructions explain how to insert the battery, focus on the target and fire.

The manual also explains that the missile will malfunction above 45 degrees Celsius, the temperature in the deserts north of Timbuktu. And it advises the shooter to change immediately into a second set of clothes after firing to avoid detection.

Its pages are numbered 313 through 338, suggesting they came from elsewhere. Mathieu Guidere, an expert on Islamic extremists at the University of Toulouse, believes the excerpts are lifted from the Encyclopedia of Jihad, an 11-volume survey on the craft of war first compiled by the Taliban in the 1980s and later codified by Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden, who led a contingent of Arab fighters in Afghanistan at the time, paid to have the encyclopedia translated into Arabic, according to Guidere, author of a book on al-Qaida's North African branch.

However, the cover page of the manual boasts the name of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb.

"It's a way to make it their own," said Guidere. "It's like putting a logo on something. ... It shows the historic as well as the present link between al-Qaida core and AQIM."

Bin Laden later assembled a team of editors to update the manual, put it on CD-ROMs and eventually place it on the Internet, in a move that lay the groundwork for the globalization of jihad, according to terrorism expert Jarret Brachman, who was the director of research at the Combating Terrorism Center when the al-Qaida encyclopaedia was first found.

N.R. Jenzen-Jones, an arms expert in Australia, confirmed that the information in the manual in Timbuktu on the missile's engagement range, altitude and weight appeared largely correct. He cautions though that the history of the SA-7 is one of near-misses, specifically because it takes training to use.

"Even if you get your hands on an SA-7, it's no guarantee of success," he said. "However, if someone manages to take down a civilian aircraft, it's hundreds of dead instantly. It's a high impact, low-frequency event, and it sows a lot of fear."

___

Associated Press writer Lori Hinnant contributed to this report from Paris, and AP journalist Amir Bibawy translated the document. Callimachi reported this article in Timbuktu, Mali and in Dakar, Senegal.

___

The document from al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb in Arabic and English can be seen at http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_international/_pdfs/al-qaida-papers-dangerous-weapon.pdf

Rukmini Callimachi can be reached at www.twitter.com/rcallimachi

Join the conversation about this story »

NASA's Latest Rocket Launch Heralds A New Industrial Revolution

$
0
0

NASA rocket sunglasses

NASA's latest rocket test normally wouldn't be big news, except for how a portion of that rocket came to be.

Ryan Whitwham of Geek.com captured the idea in just a headline: "NASA's 3D Printed Rocket Engine Did Not Blow Up."

From Geek:

The procedure employed to produce this engine is known as selective laser melting manufacturing. Whereas normal 3D printers melt and extrude plastics (usually ABS), selective laser melting uses a high-powered laser to melt and fuse metallic powders into the desired 3D structure.

Anyone who's followed the 3D printing exploits of Cody Wilson and his 3D-printed weapons company Defense Distributed knows that production of parts that handle the stresses of heat and pressure has been incredibly difficult. Not only has NASA taken a big step in the process of 3D printing metallic objects, but they've all but made certain the coming manufacturing revolution in America, and likely the world.

The part the space agency produced — a fuel injector — usually takes a year to build. Now, NASA claims they built this iteration in about 4 months, at a mere fraction of the cost.

And NASA isn't the only one who recognizes the benefits, the Department of Defense is in the mix as well.

The military is fielding mobile fabrication labs featuring 3D printers capable of customizing equipment, and Obama is dumping billions into 3D printing investment to back such initiatives.

There's even been talk of 3D printing human tissue— unproven, but if anything, NASA's bold test bolsters such thoughts.

The implications reach even into the relations of the world's super powers.

Last year, Boston Consulting Group predicted"that as much as 30% of America's exports from China could be domestically produced by 2020," Jon Koten of the Wall Street Journal reports.

Indeed, NASA's rocket test was not a step, but a giant leap for the future of 3D printing.

Join the conversation about this story »

Even Tony Stark Would Be Impressed With Raytheon's Slow Motion Missile Video

$
0
0

Okay, it's not technically a missile, but the munition— an artillery projectile — certainly looks like a missile.

Raytheon's assertion that"Analyses have shown that on 
average it takes at least 10 conventional munitions to accomplish what 
one Excalibur can"totally smacks of Tony Stark's speech in the opening scene of Iron Man.

"I prefer the weapon you only have to fire once," Stark told a bunch of military folks prior to launching a truly insane rocket.

The Excalibur, in slow mo:

Join the conversation about this story »


The US Successfully Tested An Incredible Anti-Ship Missile Today

$
0
0

LRASMb

The U.S. military's revolutionary new anti-ship missile flew its first successful test flight today, according to a release from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). 

What the U.S. currently lacks is a ship-killing missile with both the ability to be launched from far away and the technological capacity to elude enemy ship defenses.

In 2009, DARPA began work on developing such a missile, and today the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile conducted its first successful test. 

The missile was dropped from a B-1B Lancer, escorted by an F-18 Strike Eagle. It also has the ability to be launched from a Naval vessel or deployed from the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. 

Its full range and weapons payload are presently classified

READ MORE: The US Missile No Ship Will See Coming Until It's Too Late

Join the conversation about this story »

We Seriously Need To Stop Calling Them All 'Drones'

$
0
0

SF Express Drone

They deliver sushi. They film cool videos. They capture the world's greatest hippie festivals. They even perform search and rescue missions that would otherwise be completed by a St. Bernard with a barrel of brandy belted to its neck.

"Drones" also kill people (often under debatable terms) with missiles launched from altitudes which flirt with the stratosphere. 

So is it time to start differentiating between the ones that take drink orders and the ones shooting the hellfire missiles? We think so.

Case in point, today's Buzzfeed headline from John Herman "Whatever happened to Good?" puts the media organization on blast for partnering with the U.S. Air Force to do research on (gasp) drones.

From Buzzfeed:

GOOD was founded as “a free press for the critical idealist” — a publication for “people who give a damn.” But now? It’s partnering with the Air Force to help design a better drone.

Herman then goes on to list all the infographics Good published featuring how deadly drones have been over the years.

There's just one problem: the Air Force drones in this partnership are lower-budget Quadcopter "search and rescue" drones, not multi-million dollar, Obama's-watching-you-from-outer-space-finger-on-the-trigger drones.

Good got back to Herman to clarify this point later on in the afternoon — though countless unsuspecting readers who'd already read the reporting may have drawn the conclusion that a media company was aiding in the design of someone's eventual death.

Bob Cesca of the Daily Banter wrote a post recently which highlighted another misleading media report about local police buying drones. The report included a menacing picture of the drone in question, but omitted a picture showing an officer holding the drone as if it were a paper airplane.

If one didn't read carefully, or read the whole article, one might have made the conclusion that war and the surveillance state was coming home to roost — though the article notably did not refer to it as a drone but an "unmanned aerial vehicle."

Still, Glenn Greenwald made no qualms about calling it a drone to his 200,000-plus followers.

Really, what it amounts to is a model airplane with a camera attached.

Point being: as robotics invariably get smaller, more complex, and more specialized, we should come up with better names.

Maybe names that refer to specific tasks — rather than drone or unmanned aerial vehicle, we use robotic food delivery, or remote aerial camera — so that we don't have people's mothers thinking the local Sushi establishment is using Obama-death-bots to deliver her spicy salmon rolls.

And, perhaps more importantly, we'll be able to have a more informed, less sensational discussion about the inevitable role of robotics in all of our lives.

SEE ALSO: Now check out the military bots that actually do some damage

Join the conversation about this story »

Stunning Images Capture The Instant A Laser-Guided Bomb Demolishes A Speed Boat

$
0
0

GBU 10 boat

On Sept. 4, the 337th Test and Evaluation Squadron sent a solo B-1B over the Gulf of Mexico and its sea ranges to prove the concept that Lancers (or “Bones” as the swing wing bombers are dubbed) can be used to attack surface targets whilst at sea; in other words, the goal of the mission was to assess and improve the B-1′s capabilities.

According to the Dyess AFB website the B-1 released six munitions, including a 500lb GBU-54 laser guided bomb as well as 500lb and 2000lb  joint direct attack munitions (JDAM).

Lt. Col. Alejandro Gomez, 337th TES special projects officer said: “This evaluation solidifies what our crew members have already known: We can strike surface targets. The knowledge we gain from these events gives combatant commanders assurance that we can be called upon to complete the mission.”

The mission, called a “a maritime tactics development and evaluation” or TD&E ,saw the B-1 being given the goal of detect, target and engage small boats using currently fielded and available weapons, released in all weather conditions.

The dramatic photo in this post was taken during the mission and shows that the B-1 was very effective in doing its goals: the term “using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut” springs to mind as the GBU-10 is captured a split second before annihilating a small rigid hulled boat.

The Bone would give a group of Pirates a very bad day!

Richard Clements for TheAviationist.com

GBU 10 21

Join the conversation about this story »

The US Navy Just Uploaded The Sickest Slo-Mo Video Of A Ballistic Missile Defense Test

$
0
0

The U.S. Navy recently conducted a test of its Aegis missile defense system off the coast of Hawaii.

The USS Erie launched the missile, which intercepted the "most sophisticated target to date," reports Scientific American.

This test, called FTM-21 (Flight Test - Standard Missile), sent two Aegis guided missiles to intercept one short-range ballistic missile with a near simultaneous impact.

"This latest test is the first time we have seen USS Lake Erie, sailors, and Aegis BMD Weapon System schedule, analyze, launch and control multiple missiles in flight through intercept at the same time," Nick Bucci, Director of BMD Development Programs at Lockheed Martin's Mission Systems & Training business, told reporters.

The Aegis missile has a range that enables it to take out a low-orbit satellite, and mobile aboard U.S. destroyers, the guidance system has demonstrated the ability to take out a short-range ballistic missile and a cruise missile at the same time.

It is, in short, the Dikembe Mutombo of missile defense systems.

Watch:

Join the conversation about this story »

Iran Has Unveiled Two New Indigenous Air-To-Surface Missiles

$
0
0

Qader F 4

On Sept. 25, Iran’s Defense Minister, Brigadier General Hossein Dehghan together with a group of high-ranking air force officers unveiled the Qader and Nasr, two new indigenous air-to-surface missiles.

Qader is a medium-range cruise missile which can attack ground targets in the range of 200 kilometers, while Nasr is a short-range missile with a range of 35 km.

Actually, the Qader is derivative from Chinese C802 supersonic ASM (Anti-Ship Missile) whereas Nasr is an under license production of C704 subsonic ASM with two IR and radar seekers. 

Qader indigenous air-to-surface missiles

According to the information released by the Iranian authorities both missiles, that were successfully tested, feature anti-jamming technology, and can be used against maritime targets.

The two missiles were showcased next to an F-4 (a Qader was carried by the Phantom on an underwing pylon) that will be the main platform to employ the new weapons.

Nasr air-to-surface missile

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 330 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>